| HUM298 Course Guide | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Excuse me, but what do you see in your head while you're thinking? That's not something we're used to talking about. Of course, we know how to organize things in the "real" world. For instance, we can fit blocks through holes or rearrange the living room furniture. What about larger spaces, such as Buffalo? I'll bet that your mental map of Buffalo is different from mine, which looks south and is centered around the mile-long street between my house and my office. What about ideas? How do you organize
historical events? More to the point, how are you going to visualize your
digital project for this course? Start with the Concept Mapping
Workshop developed by Douglas McCabe at Hong Kong Polytechnic University. His concept mapping
page has other resources worth your while, especially those at the University of Twente.
Although McCabe concentrates on hierarchical maps, many other kinds are possible. The AIM Lab at the University of Illinois has a page called Kinds of Concept Maps showing a half-dozen others. The next page up has more resources. Much of the material focuses on using concept maps for brain- storming your own projects. You can also use them to analyze and describe the structure of other people's Web sites and hypertexts.
A purposeful arrangement of nodes and links.
If you want to pursue the ideas behind mapping, a good place to start is Concept Mapping and Other Formalisms as Mindtools for Representing Knowledge, an article by David Johassen of Penn State and Rose Marra of AT&T. For an introduction to an academic application, try the article WebMap: Concept Mapping on the Web by Brian Gaines and Mildred Shaw at the University of Calgary. The Mindtools and WebMap sites, you'll note, are a couple of years old and are examples of first-generation sites. Compare them to the second-generation pages showing off the leading commercial mapping software, Inspiration, published by Inspiration Software Inc. You can download a demo of their latest version or samples like this one.
This map may well help a student connect the course's concepts. It may also indicate to Professor Baker places where he could simplify and clarify. At a quick glance, it indicates to me that he could do more with color, box shapes, and line thickness to help simplify and clarify. What do you think? Write to me at dougand@aol.com. If you download and use the demo, I'd be happy to put your map on this page, too.
For some basic step-by-step instructions on making concept maps, try the Exploring the Environment page. Note also the links to other problem-solving techniques on that site: Classroom of the Future.
On this concept map of the HUM 298 course disclosure, the sizes of the blue oval shapes reveal my idea about the relative importance of content, structure, language, and mechanics. The squares show, in chronological order, the written (red), tests (gold), and oral (green) assignments that we will evaluate. I made all the squares the same size because they all count the same 10%. What other relationships of shape, size, color, and position do you see? HUM 298 Course Disclosure
That takes care of the nodes. Why bother with links? Because if the nodes are like the nouns in a sentence, if the attributes are like the adjectives, then links are like the verbs. And verbs are where the action is. This line-drawing exercise process might enlighten all of us:
Question: do grades tend to be higher when the the students' and teachers' concept maps are more similar?
Metaphors for Shape Collins, D. (1995). Designing Object-Oriented User
Interfaces. Redwood City, CA, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. * 2D Spatial Metaphors * 2 1/2 D Spatial Metaphors * 3 D Spatial Metaphors * Machines
|
|||||||
history || theories || hot topics || audience || info viz |
|||||||
HUM 298 Course Guide last update: April 18, 1998 by Douglas Anderson |
|||||||