Warning: This web at toLearn.net/marketing/ is two years old, it's unattended, and the links are rotting. However, in June 2000, the server recorded over 10,000 page requests during more than 3,000 visitor sessions from dozens of countries. Thus, I'm reluctant to take it down completely.

Get much of the info new and fresh:

Ricci Street | MBA 604 | marketing
computers | design | discussion forum


topbar.gif (10780 bytes)
assignmt.gif (3864 bytes)
monobar.gif (1022 bytes)

oranlogo.gif (4389 bytes) Magna Carta Debate

monobar.gif (1022 bytes)
| Assignments & Evaluation |  | Magna Carta |  | Position Statements |  | Last Update |
monobar.gif (1022 bytes)

purpose prepare for the future of marketing with new media
due written report due May 5, 1999; oral presentations on May 10, 1999
objectives 1. to sharpen your understanding of the forces and trends that are creating and shaping marketing through new media
2. to practice your search skills through the use of:
   search engines
   directories
   meta-searches
   specialized searches
   site searches

You have some fuzzy topics that will involve more than simple searches. Check out the search page on this course web.

3. to practice your writing skills:
   logical support of a thesis
   predicting cause / effect relationships
process Please think through your own position on the two statements. That will become your thesis.

Write a 500-word essay explaining the extent to which the evidence and the counter-evidence support your position (your thesis).

Using a search engine such as Metacrawler, find evidence to back up your assigned position. A good place to start would be key phrases from the Magna Carta. You will end up with three kinds of evidence:

orasmall.gif (906 bytes) statements and counter-statements by authorities
orasmall.gif (906 bytes) statistics that tend to prove and those that tend to disprove
orasmall.gif (906 bytes) your own observations that come from first-hand Web surfing
In addition to Nicholas Negroponte's explanation of the difference between bits and atoms, we found four essays so essential that everyone needs to read them.
"Utopian Visions of Cyberspace," by Laura J. Gurak, in the May 1997 issue of Computer Mediated Communications (CMC). The article begins, "I'm sure many of you have seen the recent television commercial from one of the major telecommunications companies touting the magical ability of the Internet to banish all social ills. 'There is no race,' someone claims, as a montage of faces flash by. 'There is no gender,' says yet another bright-eyed Internet believer." cmc.gif (1448 bytes)
The secretary of commerce, William M. Daley,  announced the release of a new report, "The Emerging Digital Economy". It has a lot of mind-boggling numerical projections to glaze your eyes. It has clear statements of official government policy about its role in the new economy. It has lots of information about marketing practices and trends. It has very useful URL's in the Endnotes. On top of all that, it's written in clear and plain English rather than "bureaucratese" or geek.
Please note that if you download the free Acrobat Reader, you'll be able to search the document for keywords like "government regulation."

Get Acrobat Reader

How much will two bits be worth in the digital marketplace? Read The Information Economy by Hal Varian.
George Keyworth, one of the Magna Carta authors, has speculated further about The Shape of Things: Exploring the Evolving Transformations in American Life.
format On the due date, email the position paper to me. If you get it to me soon enough, I'll be able to return it with comments before the debate.

Debate Schedule

The debate schedule has moved to the s99 students' home page. Once I receive your texts, there will be links to them on that page.

With such complex topics, I suggest that you get together with the other person on your side. Make your positions mutually supportive or two parts of a whole, or find some way to organize them and decide who goes first.

Debate Forum

The debate will be in the Alumni Room. I'll arrange for a projector. If you're going to use visuals, run them from your laptops. I'm also going to announce the debate to the campus as a whole and invite them. I don't expect a soul to show, but it's good marketing.
The front of the room will have two tables with a lectern between them. The chairs will be arrayed in theater-style rows facing the front.
By "read," I mean stand up behind the lectern and in a clear and distinct voice give a convincing reading of your argument. Imagine you're at a professional conference with potential employers or clients in the audience. Please see the oral evaluation criteria on the Assignments page. You can read off the projected screen so everyone can read along. You can use paper if you're more effective with that. Pause now and again for eye contact and to gauge your audience's interests. Don't ask for questions after you're done -- we'll do it collectively after all four papers on a topic are read.
During the discussion, you'll be sitting, but otherwise all the oral evaluation criteria still apply to you. Keep imagining that you're at the professional conference. The audience can express support for one side or the other and reasons why. The debaters can respectfully disagree with each other. They would do well to not include some evidence in their papers and save it for the discussion.

Debate Format

orasmall.gif (906 bytes) Bruce will briefly introduce the topic by trying to explain what's at stake from a larger marketing context.
orasmall.gif (906 bytes) You'll read your position statements alternating pro and con. Maximum 15 minutes each, please. 
orasmall.gif (906 bytes) After all the positions are read, each side will have a chance to respond -- pro, con, then pro again.
orasmall.gif (906 bytes) Bruce will lead a discussion about which was more persuasive.
orasmall.gif (906 bytes) When the hour is up, we'll vote on the most persuasive position.

monobar.gif (1022 bytes)

top.gif (941 bytes)


btmbar.gif (5494 bytes)
last update: May 05, 1999
http://toLearn.net/marketing/debate.htm