

Building the Palace
In 1596 Matteo Ricci taught the Chinese how to build a memory palace. He told them that the size of the palace
would depend on how much they wanted to remember: the most ambitious construction would
consist of several hundred buildings of all shapes and sizes; "the more there are the
better it will be," said Ricci, though he added that one did not have to build on a
grandiose scale right away. One could create modest palaces, or one could build less
dramatic structures such as a temple compound, a cluster of government offices, a public
hostel, or a merchants' meeting lodge. If one wished to begin on a still smaller scale,
then one could erect a simple reception hall, a pavilion, or a studio. And if one wanted
an intimate space one could use just the corner of a pavilion, or an altar in a temple, or
even such a homely object as a wardrobe or a divan.
In summarizing this memory system, he explained that these palaces,
pavilions, divans were mental structures to be kept in one's head, not solid objects to be
literally constructed out of "real" materials. Ricci suggested that there were
three main options for such memory locations.
First, they could be drawn from reality - that is, from buildings that one
had been in or from objects that one had seen with one's own eyes and recalled in one's
memory.
Second, they could be totally fictive, products of the imagination conjured
up in any shape or size.
Or third, they could be half real and half fictive, as in the case of a
building one knew well and through the back wall of which one broke an imaginary door as a
shortcut to new spaces, or in the middle of which one created a mental staircase that
would lead one up to higher floors that had not existed before.
The real purpose of all these mental constructs was to provide storage spaces
for the myriad concepts that make up the sum of our human knowledge. To everything that we
wish to remember, wrote Ricci, we should give an image; and to every one of these images
we should assign a position where it can repose peacefully until we are ready to reclaim
it by an act of memory. Since this entire memory system can work only if the images stay
in the assigned positions and if we can instantly remember where we stored them, obviously
it would seem easiest to rely on real locations which we know so well that we cannot ever
forget them.
But that would be a mistake, thought Ricci. For it is by
expanding the number of locations and the corresponding number of images that can be
stored in them that we increase and strengthen our memory. Therefore the Chinese should
struggle with the difficult task of creating fictive places, or mixing the fictive with
the real, fixing them permanently in their minds by constant practice and review so that
at last the fictive spaces become "as if real, and can never be erased."
How on earth had such a system first evolved, the Chinese
might well have asked, and Ricci anticipated the question by summarizing the ancient
Western tradition that ascribed the idea of memory training through precise placement to
the Greek poet Simonides. As Ricci explained (giving the nearest approximation he could
provide in Chinese for the poet's name):

The Mnemonic Method
Long ago a Western poet, the noble Xi-mo-ni-de, was gathered with
his relatives and friends for a drinking party at the palace, among a dense crowd of
guests. When he left the crowd for a moment to step outside, the great hall came tumbling
down in a sudden mighty wind. All the other revelers were crushed to death, their bodies
were mangled and torn apart, not even their own families could recognize them.
Xi-mo-ni-de, however, could remember the exact order in which his
relatives and friends had been sitting, and as he recalled them one by one their bodies
could be identified. From this we can see the birth of the mnemonic method that was
transmitted to later ages. |
It was this general facility for remembering
the order of things that had been elaborated into a system over the succeeding centuries;
by Ricci's time it had become a way for ordering all one's knowledge of secular and
religious subjects, and since he himself was a Catholic missionary Ricci hoped that once
the Chinese learned to value his mnemonic powers they would be drawn to ask him about the
religion that made such wonders possible.
The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci
Jonathan D. Spence
Viking, 1994

Notes
In the sixth paragraph, Spence
describes something that sounds not unlike a computer -- and not unlike a brain: storage
spaces, an image we "assign a position where it can repose peacefully until we are
ready to reclaim it by an act of memory. Since this entire memory system can work only if
the images stay in the assigned positions and if we can instantly remember where we stored
them .... " It's as easy as point and click, right?
Pronounce mnemonic
with a silent first letter.



|